Materials

CNC Machining Materials: Grade Property Data and Selection

Density, tensile, hardness, thermal conductivity, machinability index and carbide cutting speed for 33 machined grades, with the tolerance each one actually holds.

Full property matrix for 33 metal grades and 9 resins.
Achievable tolerance and Ra published per material, not one blanket figure.
ASTM, GB, JIS and EN grade equivalents cross-referenced.
CNC machined aluminum, steel, stainless and plastic parts in various grades
33 GradesWith Full Property Data
22–300%Machinability Range
±0.005 mmTightest Held, Ground
4 StandardsASTM, GB, JIS, EN

Reading Material Property Data Before You Pick a Grade

Four numbers decide most machining outcomes. Machinability index predicts cycle time and tool wear. Thermal conductivity predicts whether cutting heat leaves in the chip or stays at the tool tip. Hardness sets the cutting speed ceiling. Density converts a per-kilo stock price into a real per-part cost.

Those four explain almost every counterintuitive result on this page. Titanium Grade 5 is only twice the tensile strength of 6061 but costs eighteen times as much to buy and runs at a tenth the cutting speed, because 6.7 W/m·K of thermal conductivity means the heat has nowhere to go but the insert. Copper is soft and still machines poorly, because gummy chips weld to the edge.

The tables below give all four figures for every grade, plus the tolerance and surface finish each material realistically holds in one setup.

Easiest to Cut

C36000 Brass

Machinability 300%, 300–600 m/min carbide. The benchmark every other alloy is rated against.

Hardest to Cut

Ti-6Al-4V

Machinability 22%, 30–60 m/min. Thermal conductivity of 6.7 W/m·K is the reason.

Best Strength to Weight

7075-T6

572 MPa at 2.81 g/cm³. Higher specific strength than 316 stainless at a third the density.

Tightest Tolerance

±0.005 mm

Hardened 52100 or 440C, ground. Turned grades hold ±0.010 to ±0.020 mm.

Swipe for all four

Metal Grade Property Matrix

Every grade we cut, with the property data that predicts cycle time, cost and achievable tolerance. Machinability and cutting speed are the two columns that move your quote most.

Typical published values for the common temper or condition; verify against the mill certificate for your lot. Machinability is expressed as a percentage of AISI B1112 free-cutting steel at 100%; copper-alloy figures are converted from the C36000 = 100 copper scale, so treat cross-family comparisons as indicative. Cutting speeds assume uncoated or coated carbide in turning with flood coolant. Cost index is indicative raw stock cost per kilogram against 6061 at 1.0× and moves with market and section size.
GradeDensity g/cm³Tensile MPaYield MPaHardnessTherm. Cond. W/m·KMachinabilityCarbide Vc m/minCost Index
Aluminum
6061-T62.7031027695 HB167190%300–9001.0×
6063-T62.7024121473 HB201200%300–9001.0×
6082-T62.7031026095 HB170190%300–8001.1×
7075-T62.81572503150 HB130140%200–6002.5–3×
5052-H322.6822819360 HB138130%250–7001.2×
2024-T3512.78469324120 HB121170%200–6002–2.5×
Carbon Steel
1020 CD7.87420350121 HB51.965%120–2000.7×
10357.85550460163 HB51.065%110–1900.7×
1045 CD7.85625530179 HB49.857%100–1800.8×
Alloy and Free-Cutting Steel
12L147.87540415163 HB51.9170%150–2800.9×
12157.87540415167 HB51.9136%140–2600.9×
11447.86690620197 HB49.085%120–2001.0×
4140 / 42CrMo annealed7.85655415197 HB42.665%90–1601.2×
4340 annealed7.85745470217 HB44.555%80–1401.6×
40Cr / 5140 Q&T7.85980785207 HB ann.44.060%90–1501.1×
52100 / GCr157.81690 ann.380 ann.197 HB ann., 60–64 HRC hardened46.640%70–1201.6×
Stainless Steel
3038.00620415228 HB16.378%120–2002.4×
304 / 304L8.00515205201 HB16.245%90–1602.5×
316 / 316L8.00515205217 HB16.336%80–1503.2×
4307.75515310183 HB26.154%100–1702.2×
4207.75655 ann.345 ann.195 HB ann., to 52 HRC24.945%80–1402.6×
440C7.65760 ann.450 ann.269 HB ann., 58–60 HRC24.240%70–1203.5×
17-4PH H9007.801310117040–44 HRC17.940%60–1105×
2205 duplex7.80655450293 HB max19.030%50–904.5×
2507 super duplex7.80795550310 HB max17.025%40–807×
Brass
C360008.50340–470125–31078–99 HB115300%300–6003.5×
C377008.4436014078 HB117240%250–5003.5×
C46400 naval8.41400–600170–45555–180 HB11690%150–2504×
C48500 leaded naval8.44385–450170–365130 HB116210%200–3504.2×
Bronze
C63000 / QAl10-4-47.58690–760345–470187–229 HB3990%90–1606×
C93200 / SAE 6608.9324012565 HB47210%150–3005×
C954007.45585250170 HB59180%120–2205.5×
Copper
C10100 / TU18.94220–38070–33040–95 HRF39160%200–4004.5×
C11000 / T28.89220–39070–33040–95 HRF38860%200–4004.3×
C12200 / TP28.94220–38070–33040–95 HRF33960%200–4004.5×
Titanium
Grade 2 / TA24.51345275145 HB16.440%60–10012×
Grade 5 / TC44.43950880334 HB (36 HRC)6.722%30–6018×

Scroll inside the table to see all rows and columns

Two patterns are worth reading off this table before you commit. Cost per kilogram misleads on light alloys: 7075 costs roughly three times 6061 per kilo, but at 2.81 g/cm³ against 316 stainless at 8.00 g/cm³, a 7075 part is often cheaper in absolute terms than the stainless equivalent despite the higher unit price. And thermal conductivity, not hardness, predicts tool life at the extremes. Grade 5 titanium is softer than hardened 440C yet runs slower, because 6.7 W/m·K leaves the heat in the cutting zone.

Grade Equivalents: ASTM, GB, JIS and EN

Our factories sit in Thailand and China, so drawings arrive in one standard and stock is bought in another. These are the cross-references we work to when a print calls out a grade by a different name.

Equivalents are nearest-match, not identical. Chemistry and permitted ranges differ slightly between standards, so where a specification is safety-critical we quote against the exact called-out grade rather than substituting.
MaterialASTM / AISI / UNSGB (China)JIS (Japan)EN (Europe)
Aluminum60616061 / 6A02A6061EN AW-6061, AlMg1SiCu
Aluminum70757A09A7075EN AW-7075
Carbon steel104545S45CC45E, 1.1191
Alloy steel414042CrMoSCM44042CrMo4, 1.7225
Alloy steel514040CrSCr44041Cr4, 1.7035
Bearing steel52100GCr15SUJ2100Cr6, 1.3505
Stainless30406Cr19Ni10SUS304X5CrNi18-10, 1.4301
Stainless316L022Cr17Ni12Mo2SUS316LX2CrNiMo17-12-2, 1.4404
Stainless17-4PH, S1740005Cr17Ni4Cu4NbSUS630X5CrNiCuNb16-4, 1.4542
Duplex2205, S32205022Cr23Ni5Mo3NSUS329J3LX2CrNiMoN22-5-3, 1.4462
BrassC36000HPb59-1C3604CuZn39Pb3, CW614N
Naval brassC48500HPb61-1C4622CuZn38Sn1Pb
Aluminum bronzeC63000QAl10-4-4C6301CuAl10Ni5Fe4, CW307G
TitaniumGrade 2TA2Class 23.7035
TitaniumGrade 5, Ti-6Al-4VTC4Class 603.7165

Scroll inside the table to see all rows and columns

The substitutions that cause the most trouble are the near-misses. GB 45 steel carries a slightly wider carbon band than AISI 1045, and HPb59-1 runs a different lead content from C36000, which changes chip behaviour on long automatic turning runs. Where your print cites a standard we are not buying to, say so at quote stage and we will confirm the stock we intend to use.

Plastic Resin Property Matrix

Machined plastic has no shrinkage to design around, so the numbers that matter change. Thermal expansion and moisture uptake, not stiffness, decide whether a part is still in tolerance a week after it ships.

Typical unfilled virgin values at 23 °C. Glass and mineral filled compounds raise stiffness and service temperature while cutting thermal expansion by roughly half, at the cost of faster tool wear. Cost index is indicative stock cost per kilogram against ABS at 1.0×.
ResinDensity g/cm³Tensile MPaCont. Service °CMoisture 24hTherm. Exp. µm/m·KHeld ToleranceCost Index
ABS1.0440800.30%90±0.10 mm1.0×
PC1.20651150.15%68±0.08 mm1.8×
PA6 (Nylon)1.14801001.6–3.0%85±0.10 mm1.6×
POM-C (Acetal)1.41701000.20%110±0.03 mm2.0×
PP0.905331000.01%150±0.15 mm0.9×
HDPE0.952680<0.01%200±0.15 mm0.9×
PEEK1.321002500.10%47±0.03 mm60–100×
TPU1.2035–55800.3–0.8%150±0.20 mm2.5×
UHMW-PE0.934080<0.01%200±0.20 mm1.4×

Scroll inside the table to see all rows and columns

Nylon is the grade that catches people out. At 1.6 to 3.0% moisture uptake it can grow enough across a 100 mm dimension to leave a part out of tolerance days after inspection passed, so a nylon part dimensioned to ±0.05 mm is not reliably deliverable unless it is sealed or dimensioned in the conditioned state. POM at 0.20% and PEEK at 0.10% behave far more predictably, which is why they carry the tightest held tolerances on this list despite POM having the highest thermal expansion of the two.

Choosing a Grade From the Numbers

Start with the constraint you cannot trade away, then read across the property matrix. One requirement usually eliminates most of the list before cost enters the discussion.

Two comparisons settle most decisions. 6061 against 7075: you are paying roughly 2.5× the stock price and dropping from 190% to 140% machinability to gain 85% more tensile strength, which is worth it for a load-bearing bracket and wasted on an enclosure. 303 against 316: 303 machines at 78% against 316 at 36%, meaning roughly double the cycle time for 316, so specify 316 only where the chloride exposure genuinely demands molybdenum.

At the extremes the numbers stop being linear. Moving from 316 stainless to 2507 super duplex costs you roughly 2× the stock price and takes machinability from 36% to 25%, but pitting resistance rises enough to matter in permanent seawater immersion where 316 will eventually fail.

Choosing a CNC machining material, aluminum, stainless steel and titanium bar stock compared
If Your Priority IsGradeThe Number That Justifies It
Lowest cost, fastest turnaround6061-T6190% machinability at 1.0× cost and 300–900 m/min
Highest strength to weight7075-T6572 MPa at 2.81 g/cm³, a specific strength of 204 kN·m/kg
High volume turned fittings12L14170% machinability, the highest of any steel, at 0.9× cost
Machined stainless at lowest cost30378% machinability against 36% for 316, at 2.4× versus 3.2×
Chloride and sterilization resistance316L2–3% molybdenum; accept 36% machinability
Permanent saltwater immersion2205 or 2507 duplex450–550 MPa yield with PREN above 35
Marine hardware, machined detailC48500 naval brass210% machinability with dezincification resistance
Hardened wear surfaces52100 / GCr1560–64 HRC after heat treat; finish ground, not turned
Strength plus corrosion, heat treatable17-4PH H9001310 MPa tensile, the highest on this page
Low friction, unlubricatedPOM-C or C93200 bronze0.20% moisture uptake; ±0.03 mm held
Continuous service above 150 °C in plasticPEEK250 °C continuous, the only resin here that qualifies
Biocompatible, minimum weightTitanium Grade 5950 MPa at 4.43 g/cm³; 22% machinability is the price

Swipe the table sideways to see every column

What Tolerance Each Material Actually Holds

A single blanket tolerance figure across all materials is a marketing number. Work hardening, thermal expansion, springback and moisture uptake mean the realistic figure differs by a factor of thirty from aluminum to TPU.

Tolerances are what we hold in a single production setup without special fixturing or a secondary operation, on features up to roughly 100 mm. Tighter is available on individual features, quoted case by case. Ra figures are as-machined without secondary finishing.
MaterialHeld ToleranceBest Ra µmLimiting Factor
Aluminum 6061, 6063±0.010 mm0.4Thermal growth on long cuts; 23 µm/m·K expansion
Brass C36000±0.010 mm0.4None significant; the easiest material here to hold
Free-cutting steel 12L14, 1215±0.010 mm0.8None significant at production speeds
Carbon and alloy steel 1045, 4140±0.013 mm0.8Tool pressure and workpiece deflection
Hardened 52100, 440C above 55 HRC±0.005 mm0.2 groundRequires grinding; not achievable turned
Stainless 303±0.013 mm0.8Mild work hardening
Stainless 304, 316±0.015 mm0.8Work hardening and heat at 16 W/m·K
Duplex 2205, 2507±0.020 mm1.6Severe work hardening, rapid tool wear
Titanium Grade 5±0.020 mm0.8Elastic springback and heat at the tool tip
POM, PEEK±0.030 mm0.8Thermal expansion four times that of steel
Nylon PA6±0.100 mm1.6Moisture uptake shifts size after machining
PP, PE, UHMW, TPU±0.150 to ±0.200 mm3.2Deflection under cutting force, creep under load

Scroll inside the table to see all rows and columns

If a drawing calls ±0.01 mm on a nylon part, the tolerance is not the binding problem — ambient humidity is, and the part will drift out of print regardless of how it was cut. Tell us the operating environment alongside the tolerance and we will say at DFM stage whether the combination is deliverable. For how tolerance classes are called out on a drawing, see how to choose CNC machining tolerances.

Material Questions the Tables Do Not Answer

Which material gives the lowest cost per finished part?

Not the cheapest stock. Finished cost is stock price × density × volume, plus cycle time driven by machinability. 1045 steel is cheaper per kilogram than 6061 at 0.8× against 1.0×, but at 7.85 g/cm³ against 2.70 and 57% machinability against 190%, the same part is usually cheaper in aluminum. Steel wins back the comparison only when the section is small and the part is turned rather than milled.

What does a machinability rating of 36% actually mean for my quote?

It is the percentage of the cutting speed that AISI B1112 free-cutting steel sustains at equal tool life. 316 stainless at 36% runs at roughly a third of that speed, so a feature taking one minute in B1112 takes close to three in 316, before allowing for extra tool changes. In practice, expect machining cost to scale inversely with the index and to add a further margin on grades below 40% for insert consumption.

Why is 316 so much more expensive to machine than 304 when the strength is identical?

Both list 515 MPa tensile, but the molybdenum in 316 raises the work-hardening rate and toughens the chip, dropping machinability from 45% to 36%. The practical consequence is roughly 25% more cycle time and noticeably shorter insert life. If the part does not see chlorides, 303 at 78% machinability does the same structural job for close to half the machining cost.

Which grades survive permanent saltwater immersion?

Duplex 2205 and super duplex 2507, naval brass C48500, and aluminum bronze C63000. The mechanism differs: the duplex grades resist chloride pitting through chromium, molybdenum and nitrogen, while C48500 resists dezincification through its tin addition. Standard 316 performs well in splash and washdown but will eventually pit under permanent immersion with stagnant flow. We machine C48500 into marine hardware including yacht lighting housings.

My drawing calls out GCr15 or 42CrMo. Can you work to a Chinese GB grade?

Yes, and we buy to GB directly rather than substituting. GCr15 is the GB bearing grade equivalent to AISI 52100, JIS SUJ2 and EN 100Cr6, reaching 60–64 HRC after heat treatment for bearing races and wear surfaces. 42CrMo maps to AISI 4140 and EN 42CrMo4. The full cross-reference is in the equivalents table above, and where the match is near rather than exact we confirm the intended stock at quote stage.

Can you hold the same tolerance in plastic as in metal?

No, and a supplier who says otherwise is quoting the machine rather than the material. POM and PEEK reach ±0.03 mm, nylon realistically ±0.10 mm because it absorbs up to 3% moisture after machining, and soft resins such as TPU and UHMW ±0.20 mm because they deflect away from the cutter. Metals reach ±0.010 to ±0.020 mm depending on work hardening and heat.

How to Get a Material Recommendation

1
Send the Drawing and the Operating Conditions

STEP or IGES plus a 2D drawing. Load, operating temperature, chemical or salt exposure, required finish and annual volume through the quote form.

2
Free DFM and Grade Review

We confirm the grade suits the geometry, flag tool access and thin wall issues, check the called-out tolerance is deliverable in that material, and say where a cheaper grade performs identically.

3
Quote in Under 24 Hours

Itemised piece price, the tolerance we will hold in that specific grade rather than a blanket figure, and one costed alternative where the trade is worth seeing.

Get a Grade Recommendation

Get Your Free Quote

No commitment · Response in under 24 hours

By submitting, you agree to Meco’s privacy policy. We’ll never share your information.